Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Ford
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Per curiam
In accordance with Md.Code (1973, 2006 ReplVol.), Courts and Judicial Proceedings Article, § l-403(c), a majority of the incumbent judges of this Court ordered this appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County by appellant Exxon Mobil Corporation to be reheard in banc.
The in banc panel unanimously concludes: that counsel for Exxon Mobil did not waive the appellant’s right to challenge *11the compensatory damage award; and that the circuit court did not err in admitting the testimony of appellees’ expert witness on diminution in property values in Jacksonville as a result of the spill.
A…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard Pcb LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Woodrow Sterling v. Velsicol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Potter v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.California Supreme Court · 1993
- William Barnes v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Ayers v. Township of JacksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. AlbrightCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. FordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Bowers v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Matthews v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.