Legal Opinion

Hirsh v. J. D. Whitehead & Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1871PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Injunction heard before Clarke, J., at Chambers, April 27th, 1861. The facts of this case sufficiently appear in the opinion of ithe Court.

1Opinion of the CourtEodman, J.

The defendants recovered before a Justice of tthe Peace, of Wayne County, on 5th April, 1871, a judgment ¡against Samuel Cohen, upon which an execution issued, which ■was levied by one Wood, a Constable, upon a certain stock of ¿goods.

Hirsh, on the 11th of April, without having issued any sum¡mons or filed any complaint on affidavit, setting forth that the ¡goods in question, belonged to him by virtue of a mortgage ¡made to him by said Cohen, and that Whitehead & Co., were non-residents of the State, and that Wood was insolvent, applied to the J udge of the third Judicial District for an…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McArthur v. . McEachinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. . KinsellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Griffith v. . RichmondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  3. Miller v. . Parker .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Trexler v. . NewsomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  5. Grant v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API