Voorhis v. Langsdorf
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from St. Louis Comt of Common Pleas. This was a suit against the sheriff and the plaintiffs in execution, to recover damages for the faking the goods and merchandise claimed by the plaintiff as trustee in a deed of trust. The verdict and judgment were entered for the plaintiff, and defendants appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Comt of Common Pleas. This was a suit against the sheriff and the plaintiffs in execution, to recover damages for the faking the goods and merchandise claimed by the plaintiff as trustee in a deed of trust. The verdict and judgment were entered for the plaintiff, and defendants appealed. The deed of trust was void upon its face, under the decisions of Stanley v. Bunce, 27 Mo. 269; Billingsley’s adm’r v. Bunce, 28 Mo. 547. The deed does not appear upon its face to be made for the grantor’s own use. (Brooks v. Wimer, 20 Mo. 508 ; Walter v. Wimer, 24 Mo. 63 ; Stanley v.…
1Opinion of the CourtBates, Judge
This case was heretofore submitted to the court, and an opinion prepared by Judge Napton, in which Judge Ewing-concurred, but no judgment entered. The parties now agree that that opinion shall stand as the decision of the court, and be of like effect as if the same were rendered in said cause. Therefore, that opinion is adopted as governing the case, and,
the other judges concurring,
the judgment below is affirmed.
Napton, Judge.
This is a deed of trust, conveying a stock of merchandise, to secure the payment of a debt, and the merchandise is described as consisting of embroideries, laces, &c.,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Billingsley's Administrator v. BunceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1859
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weber v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Rocheleau v. BoyleMontana Supreme Court · 1892
- Davenport v. FoulkeIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Donnell v. ByernSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Lutz v. KinneyNevada Supreme Court · 1897
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.