Legal Opinion

Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter Casey Kroon Dennis Nelson Larry Munger Dan Silva

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 1, 2006No. 03-17343PublishedCited by 137 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEA, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether a local government’s denial of a religious group’s application for a conditional use permit to construct a temple on a parcel of land zoned “agricultural” constituted a “substantial burden” under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000ce, et seq., and if we find that the denial was a substantial burden, whether RLUIPA is constitutional.

We find that the County 1 imposed a substantial burden on Appellee Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City’s (“Guru Nanak’s”) religious exercise under RLUI-PA because…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Board of Trustees of Univ. of Ala. v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 2001

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by137 opinions

  1. Clarence Jones v. Max WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. George Mitchell v. State of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Naoko Ohno v. Yuko YasumaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Dennis Walker v. BeardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Guatay Christian Fellowship v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011

132 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API