Legal Opinion

Zitomer v. Kelmenson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1965No. Calendar 30, Docket 50,475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

This case concerns a contract between defendant Kelmenson, 1 one of a number of doctors of medicine, and plaintiff, an experienced and apparently successful businessman.

The contract (it is titled “agreement”) is an option for the purchase of stock in a company called General Capsule Corporation. The company was formed by a number of doctors of medicine and some other nonmedical incorporators. Its purpose was to manufacture capsule containers adaptable to pharmaceuticals and other ingestible products. The company was singularly unsuccessful.

Plaintiff, in some manner not clear, was asked to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kling v. FriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Rott v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. SternburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Soncoff v. City of InksterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Commercial Construction Co v. Elsman Enterprises, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. IroffMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Merit Industries, Inc. v. Automotive Replacement Parts Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API