Cargill, Inc. v. Fickbohm
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
UHLENHOPP, Justice.
This appeal involves the sufficiency of the evidence on damages in a jury-waived law action.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to plaintiff Cargill, Inc., Rule 344(f)(2), Rules of Civil Procedure, the trier of fact could find that by telephone on November 30, 1972, the wife of defendant John Fickbohm, purporting to act for him, sold Cargill’s Emmetsburg elevator 10,000 bushels of corn at $1.26 per bushel for delivery in June or July 1973, with defendant himself later to select June or July for delivery. Cargill hedged this purchase by selling a futures option…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- International Harvester Co. of America v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
- Morril v. BentleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
- Golwitzer v. HummelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Harris v. MorganSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Top of Iowa Cooperative v. Sime Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Shinrone, Inc. v. Tasco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1979
- Kanzmeier v. McCoppinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Carnation Co. v. Olivet Egg RanchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- H-W-H Cattle Company, Inc. v. Clayton SchroederCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.