Legal Opinion

Jordan v. Panorama Orthopedics & Spine Center, PC

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 13, 2015No. Supreme Court Case 13SC545PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marquez

11 In this case, we consider whether the Premises Liability Act, § 18-21-115, C.R.S. (2014) ("PLA"), applies to a commercial ten ant defendant in a lawsuit seeking damages for injuries the plaintiff sustained in a common area. Specifically, we must decide whether the tenant in this situation qualifies as a "landowner" under the PLA. 1

{2 The PLA defines a "landowner" to include both "an authorized agent or a person in possession of real property" and "a person legally responsible for the condition of real property or for the activities conducted or cireumstances existing on real property." §…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Esser v. McIntyreIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pierson v. Black Canyon Aggregates, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  3. Lakeview Associates, Ltd. v. MaesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. Jefferson County School District R-1 v. Justus ex rel. JustusSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  5. Gallegos v. PhippsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Battle North, LLC v. Sensible Housing Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Lopez v. TrujilloColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. v. Planned ParenthoodColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Lucero v. UlvestadColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Dennis v. City and County of DenverColorado Court of Appeals · 2016

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API