Legal Opinion

Phœnix Assurance Co. v. Hinds

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 10, 1903No. 13,295Published

Error from Wyandotte district court; E. L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*596The opinion of'the court was delivered by

Pollock, J.:

J. Q,. Hughes, the owner of a city lot, encumbered it by a mortgage. This mortgage was assigned to Thomas Hinds, who applied to, and procured from, the assurance company a policy of insurance, with mortgage clause attached providing for payment of loss under the policy, if any, to him as his interest might appear. At the expiration of this policy Hinds applied for, purchased and procured a second policy, with a like mortgage clause attached. Before the date of the issuance of this policy Hughes had transferred the property to Almira H.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hanover Fire Insurance v. BohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Liverpool & London & Globe Insurance v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API