Legal Opinion

Sweet v. Consolidated Aluminum Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1990No. Nos. 88-1517, 88-1518PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEREDITH, District Judge.

This appeal raises two issues regarding attorney fees and costs and whether the plaintiff-appellant is entitled to pre-judgment interest on pension benefits from the date of the appointment of the special administrator.

The appeal stems from a claim for pension benefits made by the plaintiff-appellant, Carl D. Sweet, Personal Representative of the Estate of Edward Joseph Sweet.

Edward Joseph Sweet, deceased, was a former employee of Miller Industries. Defendant, Consolidated Aluminum Corporation, is the successor to Miller Industries. Manufacturers Hanover Trust is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Short v. Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
  2. Bricklayers' Pension Trust Fund v. TaiariolCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Gavie v. Stroh Brewery Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cottrill v. Sparrow, Johnson & Ursillo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  2. Richard J. Rybarczyk, Minoru Mizuba, and William Rittenhouse v. Trw, Inc. And Trw Salaried Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  3. Donna Tiemeyer v. Community Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  4. Smith v. American International Life Assurance Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
  5. Tiemeyer v. Community Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API