Legal Opinion

State v. Wheat

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 15, 2002No. 01-2224-CRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

¶ 1. Brandon L. Wheat appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to deliver and an order denying his request for postconviction relief based upon ineffective assistance of counsel. Wheat argues that his trial defense counsel was ineffective because he failed to timely file a motion to suppress evidence found during a probation search of Wheat's home. We conclude that trial defense counsel's performance did not prejudice Wheat's defense and therefore does not amount to ineffective assistance of counsel. We therefore affirm the judgment of conviction and order…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Griffin v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Pennsylvania Bd. of Probation and Parole v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. State v. PitschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  5. State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. SwinsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  2. State v. ZiebartCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  3. State v. HowlandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  4. Logan v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2009
  5. State v. DevriesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2012

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API