Legal Opinion

Beach v. Davis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889Published

Error to Tuscola. (Beach, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Sherwood, O. J.

This suit is replevin to recover a quantity of goods sold by the plaintiffs to one Benjamin Netzorg. The plaintiffs claim the right to' rescind the sale and recover the goods in this action on the ground that Netzorg fraudulently made the purchase, which was upon credit.

In the fall of 1888, Netzorg was doing a mercantile business at Vassar, in Tuscola county. The plaintiffs, some time during the fall, sold Netzorg a bill of rubber goods, amounting to about $500. Afterwards, on December 3, 1888, Netzorg gave Robert V. Bray a chattel mortgage for $3,000 upon the entire stock of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coomer v. Gale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1879

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API