Legal Opinion

Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. Lacaze

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 30, 1940No. 2054Published

1Opinion of the Court

OTT, Judge.

The facts and issues in the case are stated in our original opinion. 188 So. 446. The only ground set up and urged in the application for a rehearing consists in the averment that this court erred in holding that defendant Clark did not intend to admit and did not admit in his answer that he owed plaintiff the stumpage value of the timber as fixed in the settlement made with Lacaze. While it is stated in the brief filed in support of the application and submitted on the rehearing that the other errors in our former opinion are not waived, yet no other errors are urged on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crowell & Spencer Lumber Co. v. LacazeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API