Legal Opinion

Lasley v. Baldwin

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1958No. Civ. No. 9354Published

1Opinion of the Court

WARNE, J. pro tem.*

This is an appeal from a judgment declaring that the holder of a C-27 landscape contractor’s license issued by the state of California has the right to install lawn sprinkler systems within the boundaries of the city of Sacramento without further qualifications, examination or testing by the city.

Appellant took the position that the installing of a lawn sprinkler system required the doing of plumbing and therefore refused respondents the license since they were not master plumbers as required by section 212 of Ordinance Number 1541 of the city of Sacramento. Section 212 of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Collins v. PriestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API