Fussell v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, P. J.
The question arising on the grant of a non-suit and. the exception thereto is: “Does the evidence for the- plaintiff, most favorably considered, show any evidential facts, or inference reasonably deducible from evidential facts, tending in any appreciable degree to establish his right to recover? If so, there is 'proof to support the plaintiff’s allegations,’ and a non-suit is erroneous. Corcoran v. Merchants and Miners Transportation Co., 1 Ga. App. 743 (57 S. E. 962); Vickers v. Atlanta & W. P. R. Co., 64 Ga. 307.” Cochrell v. Langley Mfg. Co., 5 Ga. App. 317, 320 (supra). In determining…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Georgia Railway & Electric Co. v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Reaves v. Columbus Electric & Power Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Gainesville, Jefferson & Southern Railroad v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Sappington v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Cochrell v. Langley Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cadranel v. Wildwood Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Marie Handberry, as Surviving Spouse of William Donald Handberry, Sr. v. Manning Forestry Services, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1963