Rowen v. Alladio
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Arthur L. Frazer, Judge. This is a suit by W. G. Rowen against P. Alladio, B. Sargousse and Louise E. Hamilton, to foreclose an alleged lien for material furnished and labor performed on a building owned by the defendant, Louise E. Hamilton. A demurrer to the complaint having been sustained on account of the insufficiency of the lien notice, the suit was dismissed, and from the judgment that followed the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore
This is a suit by W. G. Rowen against P. Alladio, B. Sargousse and Louise E. Hamilton, to foreclose an alleged lien for material furnished and labor performed in placing electric wires in a building owned by Mrs. Hamilton. A demurrer contesting the sufficiency of the lien notice, a copy of which is set forth in the complaint, having been sustained, the suit was dismissed, and the plaintiff appeals.
1. The part of the notification thus challenged is as follows:
“That W. G. Rowen, by virtue of a direct contract heretofore made with P. Alladio and B. Sargousse, copartners, have furnished certain…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Scannevin v. Consolidated Mineral Water Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1903