Legal Opinion
Carey v. District of Columbia
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 22, 1954No. 1423PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
QUINN, Associate Judge.
Only one question is presented by this appeal: whether peeping in the window of an occupied, lighted apartment at 1:30 in the morning constitutes disorderly conduct within the meaning of the statute. 1
The pertinent provisions of the Law Enforcement Act are as follows:
“Sec. 211. (a) Whoever, with intent to provoke a breach of the peace, or under circumstances such that a breach of the peace may be occasioned thereby,—
“(1) acts in such a manner as to annoy, disturb, interfere with, obstruct, or be offensive to others; * *
The information filed with the trial court alleged…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LePoreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- District of Columbia v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
- Commonwealth v. SwanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
- Rodgers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
- Stovall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.