Legal Opinion

Carey v. District of Columbia

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 22, 1954No. 1423PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Associate Judge.

Only one question is presented by this appeal: whether peeping in the window of an occupied, lighted apartment at 1:30 in the morning constitutes disorderly conduct within the meaning of the statute. 1

The pertinent provisions of the Law Enforcement Act are as follows:

“Sec. 211. (a) Whoever, with intent to provoke a breach of the peace, or under circumstances such that a breach of the peace may be occasioned thereby,—
“(1) acts in such a manner as to annoy, disturb, interfere with, obstruct, or be offensive to others; * *

The information filed with the trial court alleged…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LePoreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  2. District of Columbia v. JordanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Commonwealth v. SwanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  4. Rodgers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Stovall v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1964

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API