Legal Opinion

State v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 30, 1979No. 78-3329, CA 12737Published

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Following conviction on plea of guilty for Illegal Possession of Dangerous Drugs (hashish), defendant appeals claiming that the trial court erred in (1) failing to establish a schedule for payment of costs to be made during probation, and (2) imposing the condition of probation requiring defendant’s consent to all searches.

On the first assignment, defendant’s objection, coming for the first time on appeal, is not timely. ORS 137.106(3); State v. Starn, 37 Or App 914, 587 P2d 1031 (1978).

As to the second assignment, the challenged condition of probation provided as follows:

"5. Defendant shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  2. State v. StarnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API