Heina v. Gramig

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Sampson

Affirming. '

Appellant, Heina, brought this suit in the Jefferson circuit court against, appellee,. G-ramig,. to recover damages,for injuries resulting to.him from assault and bat tery alleged to have been inflicted by appellee, Gramig, on the 27th day of February, 1922. Both men were employed by the Progress Stove & Range Company, of Louisville. That concern operated a foundry. Appellant Heina, was a molder and, as we understand it, poured the molten metal, while appellee, Gramig, was superintendent and boss at the plant. On the afternoon of the day of the…