Legal Opinion
Storkline Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 18, 1962No. 19110_1PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The district court granted an order to enforce a subpoena duces tecum issued by the Board pursuant to Section 11(1) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 161, and Storkline now appeals. The complaint before the Board alleged that between November 1960 and March 1961, Storkline committed a number of section 8(a) (1) and 8(a) (3) unfair labor practices which included: laying off employees for their union activities; promising employee benefits calculated to discourage union membership in the midst of a union organizing drive; interrogating employees and potential employees concerning…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Vapor Blast Manufacturing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- National Labor Relations Board v. Chambers Manufacturing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
- National Labor Relations Board v. Duval Jewelry Company of Miami, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
3Cited by8 opinions
- North American Rockwell Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board on Relation of International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio-Clc v. Dutch Boy, Inc., Glow Lite Division and Dutch Boy, Inc., Eod Division, National Labor Relations Board v. Dutch Boy, Inc., Glow Lite DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- Fugazy Continental Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- National Labor Relations Board ex rel. International Union of Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers v. Dutch Boy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.