Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Horton

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 27, 1895Published

Mandamus.—Original suit. Heard at the March term, 1895,

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

This is a petition for a mandamus, not in aid of any case here pending, but, it may be assumed, in anticipation of some case that may come here, and the brief in support of the petition says: “We unhesitatingly declare that the doctrine announced in * * * Hawes v. People, 124 Ill. 560, is not good law and should not be a guide to this court, in such cases.”

As to the first clause or branch of that proposition we are not called upon to express any opinion, as we hold the opposite of the second clause or branch. Fitzpatrick v. C. & W. I. R. R., 31 Ill. App. 649.

The petition is therefore…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hawes v. People ex rel. PulverIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Fitzpatrick v. Chicago & Western Indiana RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API