Legal Opinion

People v. Escobar

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1980PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Jerome L. Reinstein, J.

An apparently still unsettled question in this State is the standard of proof which should govern the prosecutor’s burden of establishing the mental condition of a criminal defendant found not responsible by reason of mental disease or defect under the recently enacted Insanity Defense Reform Act of 1980 (L 1980, ch 548). Mr. Bellacosa, in his Supplementary Practice Commentaries to amended CPL 330.20 (McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 11A, Pocket Part 1980-1981, CPL 330.20, p 16), presumes that such burden is “civil in nature and therefore…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. People v. LallyNew York Court of Appeals · 1966

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. EscobarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. PasternackNew York Supreme Court · 1982
  3. People v. SimowitzNew York Supreme Court · 1984
  4. In re FleszarNew York Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API