Legal Opinion

Swisher v. Swisher

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1932PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlosser, J.

During the oral argument of this case in this court it appeared by the statements of counsel in open court that since the decree of divorce was granted by the trial eourt the plaintiff has re-married. Under these circumstances it would appear that the plaintiff has waived his right to prosecute error.

2 Ohio Jurisprudence, page 588, states the rule:

“A proceeding in error may be dismissed because the plaintiff in error has waived his right to maintain it by accepting the judgment below.”

In Buchannan, Jr. v Modern Developing Co., 82 Oh St 449, it is stated:

“Petition in error and cross petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Garner v. GarnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Rariden v. RaridenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AndersonOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Jay v. JayHawaii Supreme Court · 1944
  3. City of St. Charles v. HannonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API