Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Hutchins

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided June 26, 2013No. 12-0408/MCPublished

1DissentBaker, Chief Judge

INTRODUCTION

I respectfully dissent for two reasons. First, I do not agree with the majority’s conclusion that the Naval Criminal Investigation Service (NCIS) agent’s request for a permissive search authorization constitutes reinitiation of communication in violation of Appellant’s Fifth Amendment rights. Appellant initiated communication with the NCIS agents, and his statement was both voluntary and the result of a knowing waiver of his right to counsel. Therefore, the military judge did not abuse his discretion in denying the motion to suppress the statement, and the statement was properly…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API