Legal Opinion
Bear Indus., Inc. v. Hanover Ins. Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 4, 2018No. 2017 CA 0301PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcCLENDON, J.
*1161In this matter, a contractor and its surety appeal a trial court judgment in favor of a supplier of materials used on a construction project. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Bear Industries, Inc. (Bear) supplied limestone and sand materials to Amtek of Louisiana, Inc. (Amtek), a subcontractor on the New Roads Wal-Mart Supercenter project. The contractor was Hudson Construction Company of Tennessee (Hudson). Hanover Insurance Company (Hanover), as surety for Hudson, furnished the payment bond for the project. Bear, Hudson, and Amtek executed a Joint Check…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Leake v. ParsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Royal Ins. v. Romain Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
- Nee v. N. O. Public Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Crawford Electric Supply Company, Inc. v. Loga Holdings LLC f/d/b/a Alpha One Electrical, L.L.C., Steven Loga, Maginnis Construction Company, LLC., and The Gray Casualty & Surety CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
- Greenwood 950 LLC v. Milam & Co Construction Inc et alDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2026
- Larry Wayne Seab, Jr., and Dorothy Ann Tauscher Seab v. Donny FurlowLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
- Material Handling Technologies Inc v. Southland Process Group L L CDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2020
- Thompson Metal Fab, Inc. v. Venture Global Plaquemines LNG, LLC and KZJV, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2026