Legal Opinion

Breslin v. Liberty Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 18, 1976Published

1Opinion of the Court

69 N.J. 435 (1976)

354 A.2d 635

MICHAEL J. BRESLIN, JR. AND BRESLIN & BRESLIN, ESQS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued January 27, 1976.

Decided March 18, 1976.

Mr. Paul A. Dykstra argued the cause for plaintiffs-appellants, (Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys).

Ms. Joan B. Sherman argued the cause for defendant-respondent.

2Per curiam

The judgment of the Appellate Division is affirmed esentially for the reasons set forth in the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Lynch.

The plaintiffs relied substantially on Koutrakos v. Long…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Young v. MasciSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Caputo v. Best Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  3. Wilson v. FaullSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  4. Buzzone v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
  5. Klacik v. KovacsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API