Legal Opinion

Smith v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 23, 2025No. Civil Action No. 2022-0322Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TODD SMITH, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-cv-322 NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Todd Smith was diagnosed with late-stage colon cancer in November 2020, while employed as a manager at Defendant Amtrak. Amtrak initially permitted Plaintiff to work remotely during the COVID pandemic as an immunocompromised cancer patient undergoing treatment. But Amtrak rescinded that permission after nearly three months, instead requiring Plaintiff to take unpaid leave during his…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
  4. Ross J. Laningham v. United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
  5. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API