In Re Craft
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtGoodnow, J.
The sexual psychopath act, Laws • 1949, c. 314, does not provide and was not intended to provide that a person concerning whom a petition has been filed under section 3 shall be notified of the petition or be heard thereon before the Court’s entry of an order appointing an examining board to ascertain whether he is a sexual psychopath (s. 4).
The sole authority to file a petition requesting the Court to conduct an inquiry as to whether a person is a sexual psychopath is vested by statute in the county solicitor (s. 3). Under some circumstances, he is required to do so (s. 3 I); under others he…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Beasley v. Molett, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
- Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
- State v. MadaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
- State v. NollNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
- Beasley v. Molett, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.