Legal Opinion

In Re Craft

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 15, 1954No. 4320PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGoodnow, J.

The sexual psychopath act, Laws • 1949, c. 314, does not provide and was not intended to provide that a person concerning whom a petition has been filed under section 3 shall be notified of the petition or be heard thereon before the Court’s entry of an order appointing an examining board to ascertain whether he is a sexual psychopath (s. 4).

The sole authority to file a petition requesting the Court to conduct an inquiry as to whether a person is a sexual psychopath is vested by statute in the county solicitor (s. 3). Under some circumstances, he is required to do so (s. 3 I); under others he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AllenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beasley v. Molett, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002
  2. Eggleston v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1956
  3. State v. MadaryNebraska Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State v. NollNebraska Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Beasley v. Molett, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API