Legal Opinion
State v. Hurt
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 7, 2001No. 19263-6-IIIPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
27 P.3d 1276 (2001)
STATE of Washington, Respondent,
v.
Sidney A. HURT aka Bruce A. Pivarnrk, Appellant.
No. 19263-6-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel One.
August 7, 2001.
Hugh M. Spall, Jr., Ellensburg, for Appellant.
Laura Candace Hooper, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, for Respondent.
SWEENEY, J.
Under the federal "mailbox rule" pleadings are deemed "filed" when they are properly deposited in a prison mailing system. Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 271, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). The first question raised in Sidney Hurt's collateral attack on his guilty plea is whether…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Houston v. LackSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Evitts v. LuceySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Donald Burns v. Willis E. Morton, Superintendent Peter Verniero, the Attorney General of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Oloth Insyxiengmay v. Richard MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Massaline v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
- State v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- State v. McDermondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.