Legal Opinion

Cazak v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1925No. 24,463PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilloughby, J.

This was a prosecution by affidavit for automobile banditry as defined in ch. 82, Acts 1921. See Acts 1921 p. 91. On a plea of not guilty the defendant was tried by jury which trial resulted in a verdict of guilty, upon which judgment was entered and from which this appeal is taken.

The only assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The only specifications discussed in appellant’s brief are: (1) That the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law; (2) that the court erred in giving to the jury instruction No. 2.

Unde…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Howard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Bohan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Colondro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Small v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Schmittler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Winters v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  3. McKee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Limp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Luttrell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API