Cazak v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilloughby, J.
This was a prosecution by affidavit for automobile banditry as defined in ch. 82, Acts 1921. See Acts 1921 p. 91. On a plea of not guilty the defendant was tried by jury which trial resulted in a verdict of guilty, upon which judgment was entered and from which this appeal is taken.
The only assignment of error is that the court erred in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. The only specifications discussed in appellant’s brief are: (1) That the verdict is not sustained by sufficient evidence and is contrary to law; (2) that the court erred in giving to the jury instruction No. 2.
Unde…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Howard v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Bohan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
- Colondro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
- Lee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
- Small v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by8 opinions
- Schmittler v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Winters v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- McKee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1926
- Limp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Luttrell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.