Legal Opinion
JP Morgan Chase Bank v. Jurney
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 27, 2012No. 2D10-2973PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALTENBERND, Judge.
The plaintiff, JP Morgan Chase Bank, National Association (JP Morgan), appeals a final order sua sponte dismissing JP Morgan’s foreclosure action against the defendants, Ralph and Connie Jurney (the Jurneys). The order of dismissal prohibits JP Morgan from amending its complaint in this action, but permits JP Morgan to refile a new foreclosure action. The trial court entered this dismissal as a “sanction” because it concluded that JP Morgan failed to comply with an amendment to Florida *1183Rule of Civil Procedure 1.110(b) that requires mortgage foreclosure complaints to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Civil ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
- In Re Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar-10-9.1Supreme Court of Florida · 2012
- In Re Amendments to the Florida Family Law Rules of ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2012
- In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Appellate ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- In Re AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 3.992(A)—CRIMINAL PUNISHMENT CODE SCORESHEETSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Luz Mariana Donado and Oscar Donado v. Pennymac CorpDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. ChathamDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Ocean Bank v. Garcia-VillaltaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014