Legal Opinion

Rutgers Female College v. Tallman

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Application by defendant for dismissal of complaint. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtLawrence, J.

Ko proof was offered upon the trial to support the allegations in the complaint of a conspiracy on the part of the defendant with Henry M. Pierce, to cause mortgages to be placed upon the property involved in this controversy. The only mortgage attacked is that which was executed to James F. Pierce, all the others being conceded to be valid. The Pierce mortgage was executed June 29, 1868. The foreclosure sale under the Morrow mortgage, which is conceded to have been valid, took place on the 3d of June, 1810.

The defendant did not become a trustee of the plaintiff until June 20, lSYl. At, that…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Barr v. New York, Lake Erie & Western RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1891

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klaw v. ErlangerNew York Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API