Patee v. Parkinson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Riley District Court. The only question decided in this court is one of practice, as to which all material facts are stated in the opinion. The district court decided that the property in question was not exempt, and Patee appeals, and brings the case here on error.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
An attempt was made in this case to have the question determined, whether a two-wheeled vehicle, com*466monly called a sulkey, with an attachment, thereto specially adapting it to the use of a physician and surgeon, and actually kept and used by a physician in the business of his profession, is exempt from seizure and sale. But no bill of exceptions was taken in the court below, and no “case-made” is filed here. The transcript purports to copy an agreed statement of facts filed with the clerk of the court, signed by the attorneys of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Backus v. ClarkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
- Altschiel v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
- Porter v. HallSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. BohanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
- Woolverton v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
- Zindars v. Erie Gas & Mineral Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1906