Legal Opinion

E.C.H. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 10, 2000No. 5D99-2091PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant correctly argues that the adjudication of delinquency must be reversed because the court accepted from Appellant an uncounseled plea of no contest on two felony counts and a guilty plea to violation of probation, without first advising Appellant of his right to counsel, without first inquiring of Defendant if he wished to waive counsel and determining that such waiver was freely and intelligently made, and without securing from him a written waiver of counsel as required by Florida Rule of Juvenile Procedure 8.165(a). See T.G. v. State, 741 So.2d 517 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999), rev.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. J.O. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  2. T.G. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Mangual v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. M.Q. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  2. B.P. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  3. BP v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. MQ v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. S.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API