Legal Opinion

Villescas v. Abraham

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided September 25, 2003No. CIV. 97-B-1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, Chief Judge.

I. Background

Plaintiff Carlos Villescas sued the Department of Energy in 1997 under the anti-retaliation provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the ADEA, 29 U.S.C.A. § 621 et seq. Plaintiff argued that Defendant severely retaliated against him for his testimony in a co-worker’s ADEA and Title VII trial that tended to support the co-worker’s claims. A trial was held in Plaintiffs case in December 2000. His Title VII claim was presented to the jury. He tried his ADEA claim to the Court.

The jury…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Ackermann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dahn v. Adoption AllianceDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2016
  2. Clark v. ShraderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API