Legal Opinion

In re Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 11, 1957Published

1Opinion of the Court

Inasmuch as the petition alleged that respondent occupied 630.22 square feet of space and asked that the court fix the emergency rent on that space, there was no basis for the court’s fixing rent on an area of 669 square feet. Although, at the trial, there was some testimony by an expert that the tenant’s space, with partitions removed, would be 669 square feet, there was no amendment or even a request to amend the petition in this respect. No reason is shown why the general rule that — “A party must recover not only according to his proof but also according to his pleadings ” — should not be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosner v. U. S. Waterways Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1951
  2. Rosner v. U. S. Waterways Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API