Claim of De Gaetano v. Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Hinman, J.:
The question here is whether or not the deceased was engaged in maritime employment. The State Industrial Board has held that he was not. The facts are undisputed. The deceased was a member of the crew of a scow, equipped as a floating derrick with a hoisting engine and engaged generally in the wrecking business. It was also equipped with an air compressor for supplying air to divers operating from the vessel in subaqueous work. It was registered as a vessel with the United States Custom House and was towed at times to various places along the coast in the vicinity of New York…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State Industrial Comm'n of NY v. Nordenholt Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Claim of Norman v. Merritt & Chapman Derrick & Wrecking Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
3Cited by5 opinions
- The Sea LarkDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1926
- Taylor v. Packer Diving and Salvage CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1971
- Smith v. Union Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Millers' Indemnity Underwriters v. BoudreauxTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Michigan Furniture Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1936