Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 23, 1969No. 3 Div. 381PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLEMAN, Justice.

In a proceeding to condemn land for a highway, the state appeals from a judgment granting the landowners’ motion for a new trial.

Motions.

Appellees have filed a motion to affirm, based on the ground that appellant’s assignment of error does not comply with Supreme Court Rule 1 as amended March 21, 1966.

As here pertinent, Rule 1 recites:

“ * * * each assignment shall list the page or pages of the transcript of the record on which the ruling is recorded. * * *” 279 Ala. XXIII; Pocket Parts, ' 1958 Recompilation of Code 1940, Title 7.

Appellant’s assignment of error does not list…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  3. Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Housing Authority v. Title Guarantee Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. Jones v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kingsberry Homes Corporation v. RalstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  2. Associates Capital Corp. v. Bank of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
  3. Tucker v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  4. Kingsberry Homes Corporation v. RalstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API