State v. Smith
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
COLEMAN, Justice.
In a proceeding to condemn land for a highway, the state appeals from a judgment granting the landowners’ motion for a new trial.
Motions.
Appellees have filed a motion to affirm, based on the ground that appellant’s assignment of error does not comply with Supreme Court Rule 1 as amended March 21, 1966.
As here pertinent, Rule 1 recites:
“ * * * each assignment shall list the page or pages of the transcript of the record on which the ruling is recorded. * * *” 279 Ala. XXIII; Pocket Parts, ' 1958 Recompilation of Code 1940, Title 7.
Appellant’s assignment of error does not list…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Southern Electric Generating Co. v. LeibacherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Housing Authority v. Title Guarantee Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Jones v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kingsberry Homes Corporation v. RalstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Associates Capital Corp. v. Bank of HuntsvilleCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1973
- Tucker v. FranklinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Kingsberry Homes Corporation v. RalstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970