New York & Greenwood Lake Railway Co. v. New Jersey Electric Railway Co.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show cause.
1Opinion of the Court
*54The opinion of the court was delivered by
Lippincott, J.
The defendant is the operator of an electric street railway running from Paterson, to Passaic, and Rutherford, and along .the Little Falls road, in the county of Passaic, in this state. The railroad of the plaintiff crosses-the Little Falls road, which is a public highway, at a place-called Singac, in the county of Passaic, and also crosses the-electric street railway of the defendant which runs along said-road at this point.
On the 2d day of September, 1895, a locomotive, hired from another railroad company, and a train of cars, both…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Newark Passenger Railway Co. v. BlockSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
- Wilds v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
- New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. LeamanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
- Delaware v. SheltonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1893
3Cited by5 opinions
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917
- Scott v. Bergen County Traction Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
- Driscoll v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Spargo v. Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Ruch v. Gas Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900