Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 23, 2003No. 02-1662, 02-1703, 02-1771, 02-1673, 02-1736, 02-1700, 02-1769PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

These seven consolidated appeals by defendants Joan Marie Anderson, Arthur Henry Modderman, Rodger Bruce Yates, Francis Albert Sagorski, Ruth Elaine Shri-ver, Susan Elaine Sloboda, and Robert Lee Goodwin, Jr., raise various challenges to their respective convictions and/or sentences. The 73-count Superceding Indictment in this case charged 14 defendants with conspiracy both to defraud and to commit offenses against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371 (count 1); substantive offenses relating to the making and offering of fictitious “sight drafts” purporting to be actual…

3Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Cheek v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. United States v. Samuel Saldana, Jr., United States of America v. Saul SaldanaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. PansierCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  3. United States v. James Thomas McBrideCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. United States v. O'GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. Christos KostakisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API