Mehan v. New York State Board of Parole

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Special Term properly denied petitioner’s application to annul respondent’s determination to revoke petitioner’s parole status. Petitioner claims that his written statement, which was admitted in evidence against him at the parole revocation hearing, was obtained in violation of his right to counsel. That claim was raised and rejected on the appeal from his criminal conviction (see, People v Mehan, 112 AD2d 482, lv denied 66 NY2d 1041), and thus he is precluded from relitigating that issue in this proceeding (see, People ex rel. Dowdy v Smith, 48…