Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis Oil Co. v. Cloud

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 17, 1989No. 61473Published

1DissentSummers, Justice

I respectfully dissent. Application of the Surface Damages Act (52 O.S.Supp.1982 § 318.2-318.9 to the lease in this case (which had been executed prior to effective date of the Act) would impair contractual rights established by that lease. Because the legislature in the Act expressed that “Nothing herein contained shall be construed to impair existing contractual rights-”, 52 O.S.Supp.1982 § 318.7, I would not hold the Act applicable in this case.

The trial court instructed the jury that even though the operator had a right to use so much of the surface as was reasonably necessary for its…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Allied Structural Steel Co. v. SpannausSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Brewster v. Lanyon Zinc Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  3. Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. Ricks Exploration Co. v. Oklahoma Water Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  5. Trinity Broadcasting Corp. v. Leeco Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API