COCHRAN v. Cummings
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the Court
4 U.S. 250 (____)
4 Dall. 250
Cochran et al.
versus
Cummings.
Supreme Court of United States.
Ingersoll, and Heatly, for the plaintiffs.
M. Levy, and Porter, for the defendant.
By SHIPPEN, Chief Justice:
Wherever there is a gross misrepresentation of facts, relating to the subject of a contract, the contract is fraudulent and void. If, therefore, the jury shall be of opinion, that such a misrepresentation was made, in the present instance; they should consider the conveyance as no payment, although the plaintiffs agreed, under the deception, to accept it in satisfaction; and the verdict must be for…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Sherwood v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1813
- Farnsworth v. JENSENUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Farnsworth v. JENSENUtah Supreme Court · 1950
- Kaiser v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- National Rifle Association v. Commissioner, Florida Dept. of Law EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.