Legal Opinion

COCHRAN v. Cummings

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 1, 1802PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

4 U.S. 250 (____)

4 Dall. 250

Cochran et al.

versus

Cummings.

Supreme Court of United States.

Ingersoll, and Heatly, for the plaintiffs.

M. Levy, and Porter, for the defendant.

By SHIPPEN, Chief Justice:

Wherever there is a gross misrepresentation of facts, relating to the subject of a contract, the contract is fraudulent and void. If, therefore, the jury shall be of opinion, that such a misrepresentation was made, in the present instance; they should consider the conveyance as no payment, although the plaintiffs agreed, under the deception, to accept it in satisfaction; and the verdict must be for…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. SalmonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1813
  2. Farnsworth v. JENSENUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Farnsworth v. JENSENUtah Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Kaiser v. Wells Fargo Clearing Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025
  5. National Rifle Association v. Commissioner, Florida Dept. of Law EnforcementCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API