Legal Opinion

Village of Utica v. Rumelin

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1938No. 30230Published

1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.

Defendant was convicted and fined for selling bread products from a truck in Utica without paying the occupation tax.

The amended complaint is in three counts. Each charged defendant with separate sales in Utica by wholesale to a retailer from a truck, without paying the occupation tax levied by the village ordinance. It is conceded that the occupation tax was not paid. The evidence shows that defendant made sales of the products baked by Smith Baking Company of Lincoln, selling at wholesale to business men In the towns along his route, including Utica. Smith Baking Company owned the truck…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nichols v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1922
  2. P. F. Petersen Baking Co. v. City of FremontNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. McLaughlin v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Sandlovich v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Gooch Food Products Co. v. RothmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API