Legal Opinion

Austin v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 18, 2003No. 02-3524PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Circuit Judge.

Pro se plaintiff John W. Perotti (“Perot-ti”) appeals from the district court’s approval of a settlement between a class certified pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(2), which included Perotti, and the defendants over conditions at the Ohio State Penitentiary (“OSP”). He claims that the district court erred in failing to rale on his motion to dismiss himself as a class plaintiff. Because a Rule *2528(b)(2) class is a mandatory class, however, Perotti could only object to the terms of the class settlement through the fairness hearing. Because the district…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Addie T. Coleman, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kane v. WinnDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
  2. Ackerman v. WashingtonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021
  3. Price v. WhitmerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API