Legal Opinion
Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 26, 1976No. 75-3416PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Per curiam
The Interstate Commerce Commission granted Motor Cargo, a motor carrier, temporary authority to transport general commodities over regular routes between Wells, Nevada, and Los Angeles, California. Petitioners and other competing carriers protested the Commission’s action and sought its reconsideration, but the Commission refused to do so. This petition followed. '
In awarding temporary authority to Motor Cargo, the Commission acted under the aegis of § 210a(a) of the Interstate Commerce Act, 49 U.S.C. § 310a(a), which provides as follows:
“(a) To enable the provision of service for which there…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- American Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Bell Lines, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1969
- In the Matter of Dan A. SpencerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Superior Trucking Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969
- H C & D Moving & Storage Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1970
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- East Coast Transportation Company, Inc. v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- Union National Bank of Pittsburgh v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Barnes Freight Line, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Blue & Grey Transit Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- Garrett Freightlines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.