Jackson v. State

By the undisputed testimony it is admitted that this appellant was engaged in the practice of a chiropractor in Randolph county, and within the time covered by the complaint against him in this case.

The evidence ,is also without conflict upon the proposition that he engaged in such practice, as aforesaid, without having obtained a certificate of qualification from the state board of medical examiners.

Under the law of this state any person who treats, or offers to treat, diseases of human beings, by any system of treatment whatsoever, must obtain a certificate of qualification so to do from…