Legal Opinion
ALBRIGHT v. CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 29, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00112Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA BRIAN ALBRIGHT, et.al., ) Plaintiffs, Vv. ) Civil No. 3:21-cv-000112 ) Judge Stephanie Haines CONCURRENT TECHNOLOGIES ) CORPORATION, et.al., ) Defendants. OPINION I. Introduction Plaintiffs Brian Albright, Richard Newman, and Jacob Mullins (“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint in Civil Action (ECF No. 1) against defendants, Concurrent Technologies Corporation (“CTC”), Concurrent Technologies Corporation Foundation (“CTCF”), and Enterprise Ventures Corporation (““EVC”). CTC, CTCF, and EVC moved to dismiss (ECF No. 15) the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Edward Arthur v. Maersk, Inc. D/B/A Maersk Line Ltd. Dyn Corp. Technical Services D/B/A Dyn Marine Services the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Lorenz v. CSX Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Adams v. Gould Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Curtis Long v. Harry Wilson, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.