Legal Opinion

United States v. Farrah

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 12, 2001No. Docket No. 00-1618Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the judgment of said District Court be and is AFFIRMED.

Rhonda Farrah appeals from a judgment of conviction and sentence entered against her following a jury trial in the District Court. Farrah was convicted of two counts of wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343; two counts of tax evasion, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201; and thirty-three counts of money laundering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(a)(l)(B)(i). The District Court sentenced Farrah, in principal part, to 60 months’ imprisonment for each…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. Won Tae KimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Samuel O. White, Luis Noel Cruz, AKA Danny CruzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Francis Mariani, Louis Fargnoli, Francis Mariani, and Daniel MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. John BairdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API