Legal Opinion

In re Finck

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Van Vorst, J. —

The judgment, upon which the execution was issued under which the defendant is imprisoned, does not materially involve the petitioner in any moral guilt or establish that his proceedings have not been just and fair. It is true that the complaint in the action charged the defendant with having wrongfully converted the plaintiff’s bonds, and with fraud and deceit in respect thereto ; yet, in the end, the learned judge before whom the trial was had, held that the defendant was liable as a partner with Bushnell, who had tortiously taken the bonds, and that the position of Bushnell…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re LowellNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API