Legal Opinion

Kase v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 22, 2016No. A143590PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BANKE, J.

Plaintiffs appeal from a defense summary judgment in this asbestos case arising from Gary Ease’s exposure to asbestos insulation used on nuclear submarines during the early 1970’s. The principal issue we must decide is whether the Navy’s procurement of asbestos insulation for its nuclear submarines comes within the ambit of the government contractor defense set forth in Boyle v. United Technologies Corp. (1988) 487 U.S. 500 [101 L.Ed.2d 442, 108 S.Ct. 2510] (Boyle). This defense has long been available, even if not always successfully proved up, in asbestos lawsuits brought…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Wallis v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. In Re Agent Orange" Product Liability LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re BROOKLYN NAVY YARD ASBESTOS LITIGATION (Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown v. Dept. of Corrections etc. CA1/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Nichols v. Covidien LPDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API